Mvc java game pattern

The Model and Controller can be done in one script for each:. BounceModel with the bounces and winCondition fields. With all scripts set and the game running, we should get this output in the Console Panel. As shown in the example above, when the ball hits the ground its view executes app.

OnBallGroundHit which is a method. OnSomethingComplexName methods in order understand what kind of actions can happen during execution. By only checking one file, it is possible to understand the overall behavior of the application.

Now, we only need to adapt the BallView and BounceController to handle this new system. Bigger projects will have a lot of notifications. So, to avoid getting a big switch-case structure, it is advisable to create different controllers and make them handle different notification scopes.

Adjusting your way of thinking in terms of the three elements of MVC, and learning to visualize the entities as an ordered hierarchy, are the skills that ought to be polished. In bigger projects, developers will be faced with more complex scenarios and doubts about whether something should be a View or a Controller, or if a given class should be more thoroughly separated in smaller ones.

But there are some simple rules that I typically follow to help me determine whether to define something as a Model, View, or Controller and also when to split a given class into smaller pieces. Usually, this happens organically while I think about the software architecture or during scripting. We want to reduce the script size and get rid of player and OnPlayer prefixes.

Let me demonstrate using a Model class because it is more simple to understand using data only. During programming, I usually start with a single Model class holding all data for the game.

It is easy to see that the more complex the game, the more numerous variables will get. With enough complexity, we could end up with a giant class containing model. Nesting elements will simplify the code completion and also give room to switch between variations of data.

With this configuration of classes, developers can intuitively navigate in the source code one concept at a time. The fact that GunModel is contained in a class allows the creation of a list of Prefabs preconfigured GameObjects to be quickly duplicated and reused in-game for each category and stored for later use.

In contrast, if the gun information was all stored together in the single GunModel class, in variables like gun0Ammo , gun1Ammo , gun0Clips , and so on, then the user, when faced with the need to store Gun data, would need to store the entire Model including the unwanted Player data.

In this case, it would be obvious that a new GunModel class would be better. Improving the class hierarchy. As with everything, there are two sides of the coin. Sometimes one can unnecessarily over-compartmentalize and increase the code complexity.

Only experience can hone your skills enough to find the best MVC sorting for your project. There are tons of software patterns out there. In this post, I tried to show the one that helped me most in past projects. Developers should always absorb new knowledge but always question it, too. I hope this tutorial helps you to learn something new, and at the same time, serves as a stepping stone as you develop your own style.

Also, I really encourage you to research other patterns and find the one that suits you best. One good starting point is this Wikipedia article , with its excellent list of patterns and their characteristics.

Subscription implies consent to our privacy policy. Thank you! Check out your inbox to confirm your invite. The business logic must be into your model. But the flow of the program can be in a controller. I have see some cases where there is a super controller that drive the others. Personally I prefer to keep the main method on a separate class and ideally to move the program loop outside of the controllers but in your case, I don't see any good reason to do it. Aside of that, you can improve a bit your code by providing the OutputStream and InputStream to your view and controller, it will be easier to test.

I am also a fan of the Formatter when you have many print to the console. And as said by Flamaker you can improve the validation logic but also be less restrictive on the number of answers. Say there will be difficult and easy questions in one day, would it be an easy change to do? For view class, we have many System.

Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group.

Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Asked 3 years, 11 months ago. Active 3 years, 11 months ago. Viewed 2k times. The algorithm: Display a question and its possible answers. Ask the user for his suggestion. If he was right: Give the user a point. Go to step 1. If he was wrong: Exit the program. Source Files Main. Game over. Improve this question. For example, dropping an item, attacking an NPC, whatever. It is also responsible for gathering up data and doing any conversion or processing to make it easier for the View layer to display it.

Now, the way I've described it above is as though there is a very distinct event sequence driving the game that is probably only really appropriate for a web game. That's because that's what I've spent my time on lately. In a game which is not driven by a user's request and a server's response like the web e. For example, if actions take place in the Model because time is passing then you might not want to have the View layer constantly polling the Model for updates.

Instead by using the Observer pattern the Model could notify any observers of changes to Model objects as they happen. That could in turn be used to prompt immediate update to the View to reflect the change.

Then if 60 seconds passing resulted in some repairs happening for the player's base, the base could effect the repairs and immediately notify any Observers attached to it that the base has updated. The View could be attached as an Observer and note that it needs to re-display the base because its state has changed. The notification itself might have included enough information to update the View or it might have to turn around and consult the model in order to update, but the result will be the same.

You're getting along there. If it would change the way it looks without changing basic data, then it's in the view. If it is data that could be viewed in many ways, it's the model. And if it's how you play, then it's the control. So if it's whether you draw an "axe" with two blades or one, it's view. If it's how many hit points damage you inflict with an axe, it's model.

And if it's whether you swing the axe by typing "s" or by right clicking, it's control. I did indeed make a game that utilized MVC pattern. What I have found later though was that what I did was overkill.

I tried to fit pretty much every single class I made into one category in MVC. What I suggest is to read "Design Patterns" by the gang of four. There are a lot of useful patterns besides MVC. Sometimes it doesn't make any sense to use MVC at all. Especially for games I am not sure if MVC is such a good idea.

The reason being that you don't want to display a game object in many different ways views , but you want to reuse a drawing code for many different types of game objects.

For my own 2D game engine I used the strategy pattern quite actively. The game objects, like the player and the monsters I called a Sprite. I let the drawing of the sprite be handled by a strategy pattern.

That is when I called sprite. The benefit of this approach is that you can share a view object between several sprites. Because typically there will be a lot of e. So behavior I would also use a strategy pattern which would be a object which contains code describing behavior. That way I can apply the same behavior to several monsters at different location.

So each frame I would call an update function to update position orientation and what monster does. There are loads of variations of this. In my current implementation I have even separated out currentPosition , speed , orientation and advance into a separate object called MotionState. This is so I can build a search trees of possible positions and orientations when doing path searching algorithms.

Then I don't want to carry with me information about how to behave each update or how sprite should be drawn. I've done a little work with Flash game development. Here is an article about object pools in Flash. The concept is cross-platform and may give you some ideas. You're right to be concerned with all the stuff going on at one time. Depending on your game design, your game loop can have a lot to deal with.

This is where you'll learn all the dirty optimization tricks, often the hard way :.